Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Project-based Learning for Innovation (Deeper Learning)



Project-Based Learning Leads to Innovation


The number one question I am asked is what teaching for the global innovation age looks like. My colleague Lisa Tyrrell offers a glimpse at promising practices.
By Lisa Tyrrell
At the recent Deeper Learning Conference at High Tech High in San Diego, keynote speakerDr. Tony Wagner spoke about the importance of preparing students for the innovation economy. He knows a thing or two about this: Wagner is the first Innovation Education Fellow at the Technology & Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard University and author of Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World.
Many of the young, successful entrepreneurs that Wagner interviewed for his book noted that it was their project-based learning experiences that prepared them to be successful in the global innovation economy.
How are schools working to encourage the next generation of innovators? By developing unique, project-based learning opportunities that foster students' passion and creativity, teachers are promoting innovation and Deeper Learning. Deeper learning experiences help students master core academic content, think critically, solve complex problems, work collaboratively, communicate effectively, and engage in self-directed learning.
For example, consider Brian Bailey, English teacher at the Ambassador School of Global Leadership in Los Angeles, California. Brian allows students "Innovation" time each Friday in order to investigate their personal passions. This practice is modeled after Google's twenty-percent time—where employees can spend 20% of work time on anything they want, with the belief that free thinking and tinkering leads to innovation. One student is learning to program a computer to respond to voice commands. Another student is attempting to develop a substance that will keep gum from sticking to tables. Other students are sponsoring children from other countries, working on a water purification system for salt-water, and trying to patent a product that will remove stains from suede. A small group of students are collaboratively reviewing the work of The National Research Council Committee to assess fuel economy technologies for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. This group is then working together to investigate ideas for greater fuel efficiency. Through self-directed learning, all these students are learning core academic content while thinking critically and solving complex problems.
Another good example comes from The Denver Center for International Studies (DCIS), where upperclassmen are afforded the opportunity to explore their personal passions through a program called Passages. This multi-year, project-based course allows students to engage in self-directed learning based on their individual interests in global issues. Students collaborate with faculty and community mentors to research a self-selected topic. Sample projects include: investigating the benefits and innovations that were a result of NASA spending; researching brain plasticity theories and treatments for Alzheimer's, stroke, and phantom limbs; exploring renewable energy and testing different types of bio-diesel; developing a mentoring program for DCIS between High School and Middle School students; collecting medical supplies for Project Cure and working in a village in the Dominican Republic; organizing a trip to Thailand to work at an elephant rescue camp; service learning trip to two Haitian villages in the Dominican Republic; and facilitating student exchanges with other international studies schools and the developing a website for ongoing communication between students. Each spring, seniors exhibit their learning to the DCIS community and their committee. These projects engage the students in each of the tenets of Deeper Learning.
These are just two of several examples of the innovative teaching and deeper learning occurring schools. Both schools are part of the Asia Society International Studies Schools Network, which is part of The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation's Deeper Learning Community of Practice.

Monday, April 22, 2013

STEM & the Outside World - Making the Environmental Connection (Happy Earth Day!)


Guest Blog: Connecting environmental education and STEM

What are the learning goals of environmental education? How are they best accomplished? How do they support the broader goals of improving students’ STEM skills?

Students have an innate curiosity – even wonder – about the natural world around them. Environmental education (EE) taps into their enthusiasm and provides them the knowledge and skills to solve 21st-century challenges. Early connection with the environment also equips students to make everyday decisions that improve the quality of their lives and the health of our planet.
The goals of EE can be accomplished well through project-based learning and hands-on exploration of the outdoors. Local, place-based environmental projects provide relevant learning experiences for students and an opportunity to make a meaningful difference in their communities.

Through EE, students learn not only STEM content, but also develop the critical thinking, problem-solving and decision-making skills that are critical for success in STEM careers where substantial growth is expected. Further, studies indicate that young people who experience the natural world and have more opportunities to play and learn within it are more likely to choose science or related fields as careers.

What are the opportunities and obstacles to introducing students to environmental education?

While field trips and opportunities to explore nature centers and other nonformal education settings are valuable to sparking interest and deeper knowledge about the environment, lack of time and resources can make it challenging for teachers to provide those opportunities. Increasingly, schools are investing in enriching the more accessible laboratories for learning that exist right outside the classroom door, in a nearby park, the schoolyard, school garden -- even the school building itself. Recognizing the national priority on successfully engaging more students in STEM, significantly more environmental science content is being integrated across multiple disciplines. There are expanded opportunities within the new Next Generation Science Standards to emphasize science learning through an environmental context, through content on human impacts on the natural world.

What do policymakers and decision makers need to know when thinking about STEM learning and environmental education?

Research and survey findings indicate young people have a strong interest in the environment. Total employment in STEM jobs is expected to increase by twice as much as all other jobs by 2018 and environmental science jobs are expected to grow by 25% by 2016 – the fastest among the sciences. Sources and additional statistics can be found in the new Tech & Our Planet infographic.
In 2011 the U.S. Department of Education developed the Green Ribbon Schools recognition award, which honors schools that are exemplary in reducing environmental impact and costs; improving the health and wellness of students and staff; and providing effective environmental and sustainability education, which incorporates STEM, civic skills and green career pathways. This year, as part ofNational Environmental Education Week, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan did a PSA that speaks to the important connection between EE and STEM.

Submitted by Jennifer Tabola, senior director of education, National Environmental Education Foundation

Friday, April 19, 2013

On Connected, Community/Interest Based Learning



Wednesday Interview - Breaking the Cycle of Students' Disengagement by Having Them Leave, to Learn

Join me Wednesday, April 17th, for a live and interactive FutureofEducation.com conversation with Elliot Washor and Charles Mojkowski on their new book, Leaving to Learn: How Out-of-School Learning Increases Student Engagement and Reduces Dropout Rates.

The first step to addressing the nation's dropout rate, Elliot and Charlie argue, is letting students "leave, to learn."  (From the book's description:) "It's an alarming fact: in the U.S., one student drops out of school every 12 seconds. Elliot Washor and Charles Mojkowski, both of Big Picture Learning, have a proven, innovative solution for stemming the flow of drop-outs and breaking the cycle of disengagement that leads up to it. It's called leaving to learn. Leaving to Learn helps us deeply understand the real reasons kids drop out and the essential conditions for productive learning that today's adolescents require. The authors then make a compelling argument: in order to retain students through to graduation, schools must offer experiences where students do some of their learning outside of school. With common sense 'rules of the road,' the authors offer nuts and bolts guidelines for implementing a high-quality Leaving to Learn program, including:examples of the many forms of out-of-school learning: internships, travel, community service, independent projects, and more seamlessly integrating students' outside learning with in-school curriculum assigning academic credit for out-of-school accomplishments."

Date: Wednesday, April 17th, 2013
Time: 5pm Pacific / 8pm Eastern (international times here)
Duration: 1 hour
Location: In Blackboard Collaborate (formerly Elluminate). Log in at http://www.futureofed.info. The Blackboard Collaborate room will be open up to 30 minutes before the event if you want to come in early. To make sure that your computer is configured for Blackboard Collaborate, please visit the support and configuration page.
Recording:  A full Blackboard Collaborate recording is athttps://sas.elluminate.com/p.jnlp?psid=2013-04-17.0748.M.9E9FE58134BE68C3B413F24B3586CF.vcr&sid=2008350 and an audio mp3 recording is athttp://audio.edtechlive.com/foe/leavingtolearn.mp3 and at http://www.futureofeducation.com.
Mightybell:  A Mightybell space with interview resources and to continue the conversation is at https://mightybell.com/spaces/44050.

Elliot Washor, Ed.D. is the co-founder and co-director of Big Picture Learning. He is also the co-founder of The Met Center in Providence, RI.

Elliot has been involved in school reform for more than 30 years as a teacher, principal, administrator, video producer, and writer. He has taught and is interested in all levels of school from kindergarten through college, in urban and rural settings, across all disciplines. His work has spanned across school design, pedagogy, learning environments, and education reform and is supporting others doing similar work throughout the world. Elliot’s interests lie in the field of how schools can connect with communities to understand tacit and disciplinary learning both in and outside of school. Elliot is deeply committed to imagining Big Picture Learning as a ‘do-think-do’ organization, and persistently pushes the boundaries of its design in order to continually innovate practice and influence in the world of education.

At Thayer High School in Winchester, N.H., Elliot’s professional development programs won an “Innovations in State and Local Government Award” from the Ford Foundation and the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He has been selected as an educator to watch in Rhode Island and has recently been selected as one of the Daring Dozen – the Twelve Most Daring Educators in the World by the George Lucas Educational Foundation. His dissertation on Innovative Pedagogy and New Facilities won the merit award from DesignShare, the international forum for innovative schools.

Elliot lives in sunny San Diego with his wife and five dogs.

Charlie Mojkowski worked with Elliot Washor and Dennis Littky in creating Big Picture Learning and The Met School in Providence. He currently works with Elliot on developing new initiatives that refine and extend the Big Picture Learning design. Charlie has served as an independent consultant to education and business since 1976. He works primarily in the areas of school and curriculum improvement, leadership and organizational development, program evaluation, and applications of technology that support that work. Charlie designed, administered, and taught in a doctoral program in educational leadership; directed the Rhode Island Educational Leadership Academy; and served as Executive Director of the Rhode Island Association of School Principals.

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Something that speaks to our conversation last night, on planning to use the right tools for the right purpose - (adding student participation helps solve education's problem)


Bob Wise

GET UPDATES FROM BOB WISE



Technology in Education: Before You Make a Purchase, Make a Plan

Posted: 04/16/2013 4:45 pm


If you're a school or district leader who is considering using education technology and digital learning in your schools, stop.
Technology can play a huge role in boosting student achievement, but simply slapping a netbook on top of a textbook is not enough. Before making a technology purchase, school and district leaders must develop a plan for how they will use digital learning -- the effective use of technology to improve student learning outcomes -- to address their school or district's specific challenges and learning goals.
During the next 24 months, the nation's education landscape will change greatly as states and districts face numerous challenges, including dealing with shrinking budgets, implementing college- and career-ready standards for all students; and using technology-administered assessments to gauge student comprehension and learning. District and school leaders can realize a significant opportunity by adopting and implementing digital learning to help meet these challenges while also achieving the goal of college and career readiness for all students.
That's why my organization, the Alliance for Excellent Education, recently launched Project 24, a ground-breaking new initiative to help school districts think strategically about how to integrate technology into instruction to ensure student learning is more engaged, rigorous, and relevant. Inspired by districts likeQuakertown Community School District (PA)Mooresville Graded School District (NC)Dysart Unified School District (AZ), and Cajon Valley Union School District (CA), and working with a wide range of national partners, the Alliance marshaled top-level educators and assembled a digital learning planningframework that will encourage and support districts working to transform learning in their schools.
Technology provides students with access to both online and traditional classroom opportunities that leverage data systems and interactive software -- that may not normally be available -- to engage and support students. With comprehensive planning and teacher support, technology can be an equalizer by providing the same educational opportunities to low-income students and students of color as it does to more affluent students. Technology can also be used to tailor learning based on each student's needs.
Effective digital learning provides technological tools that allow teachers to be designers of each student's individual pathway for achieving success. Technology enhances the teacher's role in the classroom by opening up new opportunities for instructional strategies and digital content and resources. Additionally, online professional development opportunities can connect teachers with mentors and expert colleagues worldwide, which enables real-time collaboration on lesson plans and best practices.
Around the country, leading-edge school districts, such as those referenced above, demonstrate that technology can improve learning outcomes. But for many districts, sorting out the complexities of technology can be chaotic and overwhelming. In my travels around the country, I hear from many school and district leaders who tell me they are inspired but don't know where to start and need advice on which way to go.
Many have turned to Project 24, where individual school districts assemble a team of leaders and take a self assessment as a first step in the planning process. In return, each team receives a set of tools and resources to plan how to implement strategic use of digital tools in key areas, such as academic supports; budget and resources; curriculum and instruction; data and assessments; professional learning; technology and infrastructure; and use of time.
In addition the Alliance recently announced that participating districts will have access to a Massive Open Online Course for Educators (MOOC-Ed). This seven-week course, developed in partnership with the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University, provides a new type of learning experience for education leaders that will help them identify the potential of technology-enabled learning opportunities. The MOOC-Ed course began on April 8. More than 2,000 individuals are participating in the course, and that number continues to grow.
More than 500 school districts -- representing approximately nine million students from forty-two states and the District of Columbia -- have already signed up to participate in Project 24. These districts' leaders know that the objective is not having the latest technology; it's about improving learning by implementing reliable, common-sense solutions that support teachers and engage students.
The critical decisions district leaders face today about technology adoption and implementation will have an impact on students for the next decade. As the old saying goes, "The best time to plant a tree was 20 ago; the second best time is today." The clock is ticking, and the time to plan is now.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

GRANTS - Afterschool Alliance & Noyce Foundation (STEM Impact Partnerships)


Afterschool Alliance and Noyce Foundation launch $10K Afterschool STEM Impact Awards

The Afterschool Alliance and the Noyce Foundation are excited to announce the new Afterschool STEM Impact Awards!  Two $10,000 awards will be awarded to exemplary afterschool programs offering science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) to students in grades 4 through 8.  As afterschool STEM programming grows around the nation, we want to recognize programs that are clearly demonstrating their impact on participants.  Applications for this year are invited for two award categories—strong partnerships and strong computing and/or engineering programs.
 
Additional details are available on the award website, along with a link to the online application.Applications are due by May 15, 2013. http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/STEM-impactawards.cfm

Monday, April 1, 2013

Schools beginning to focus on K-12 Engineering Curriculum: More Out-of-School Possibilities to Connect!


FOCUS ON: ENGINEERING

Engineering Building a Foundation in K-12 Curricula


Sophomore Brett Dennehy, center, watches his creation as he and classmates prepare last week for a robot race in an introduction to engineering course at Stoughton High School in Stoughton, Mass.
—Charlie Mahoney/Prime for Education Week

When STEM education is discussed in the K-12 sphere, it often seems like shorthand for mathematics and science, with perhaps a nod to technology and even less, if any, real attention to engineering. But recent developments signal that the "e" in STEM may be gaining a firmer foothold at the precollegiate level.
For one, a new, national assessment in technology and engineering literacy will be administered to 8th graders next year by the makers of "the nation's report card" on education. Also, engineering design is threaded through a set of "next generation" science standards nearing completion by a coalition of experts and 26 states.
And the first-ever Advanced Placement program in engineering may be on the horizon, as efforts to create one appear to be building steam.
Those developments come on top of the many recent, and some long-standing, programs and projects that bring engineering into the classroom.
In Mobile, Ala., for instance, middle schools are using a recently crafted set of curricular units, each intended to be taught half in math class and half in science.
"The students, as they go from math to science, are trying to solve a design challenge," said Susan A. Pruet, the director of Engaging Youth Through Engineering at the Mobile Area Education Foundation, which devised the curricula with support from a $3.5 million National Science Foundation grant.
In one unit, students design a barrier system for a stream bed to reduce the sediment discharge rate. In another, they design a device to catch blood clots before they reach the lungs and ensure that blood still flows at a fast enough rate, she said.
Ms. Pruet argues that engineering really is at the heart of STEM.
"To me, STEM is integrated science, technology, and math through engineering. It is the glue."
Meanwhile, a yearlong course, Engineer Your World, developed by the University of Texas at Austin in collaboration with engineers from NASA, is being piloted this year at 23 high schools in eight states, with plans to reach 100 campuses next year.
Two of the best-known precollegiate engineering initiatives have seen exponential growth in recent years. Project Lead the Way's Pathway to Engineering curriculum, a sequence of engineering courses that aim to deliver a "hands-on, real-world" approach to solving problems, is being offered this academic year in some 2,760 U.S. high schools, 10 times the figure from a decade ago. More than 45,000 elementary teachers are using curricular units from Engineering Is Elementary, a program launched in 2004 by the Museum of Science in Boston.
"The kids keep asking: 'When are we going to be able to be engineers again?' " said Jennifer L. Haynes, a 2nd grade teacher at Woodland Elementary School in the Lakota district in southwest Ohio, which brought the program to its elementary schools this year.
Lots of out-of-school STEM initiatives with a strong engineering component have cropped up or substantially expanded over the past few years, from robotics competitions to after-school engineering clubs. The Change the Equation, a coalition of business leaders championing STEM education, said during a forum last month on engineering in schools. "Many of our students reach college without any real exposure to hands-on engineering, or in some cases understanding what engineers do."

Crowded Out?

Experts say it's difficult to know how widespread engineering education is today at the K-12 level.
Design to Learn
A variety of programs seek to expose young people to engineering, whether in the classroom or in out-of-school settings.
Engineering by Design: Provides K–12 engineering and technology curriculum developed by the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. At grades K-5, it provides content to be integrated with other subjects. In the upper grades, it offers a set of courses with a focus on learning concepts and principles in an “authentic, problem-based environment.”
Future City: Provides project-based learning experiences in which students in grades 6-8 design cities of the future. Groups of students team up with an educator and engineer-mentor to plan cities using special software, research and write solutions to an engineering problem, build tabletop models, and present their ideas at competitions.
The Infinity Project: Offers engineering curricula for middle and high school students that help them see the value of math and science through their application in high-tech engineering. Based at Southern Methodist University.
Project Lead the Way: Offers the Pathway for Engineering program, a sequence of high school courses intended to have students learn and apply the engineering-design process, acquire strong teamwork and communications proficiency, and develop critical-thinking and problem-solving skills. It also offers a middle school program, Gateway to Technology, with a strong engineering focus.
SeaPerch: Equips teachers and students with resources to build an underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle in an in-school or out-of-school setting, following a curriculum that teaches engineering and science concepts. Sponsored by the Office of Naval Research. The third National SeaPerch Challenge competition is in May.
TechBridge: Seeks to inspire girls to discover a passion for technology, science, and engineering. Its offerings include hands-on after-school and summer activities for girls, teacher professional development, and resources to help connect stem professionals as role models with young people. Founded by Chabot Space & Science Center in 2000.
A 2009 report by the National Academy of Engineering and the National Research Council said it was "almost invisible" in schools and "few people even think of it as a K-12 subject."
More recently, a survey conducted last year on math and science education found that about one in four high schools offers an introductory engineering course, though some analysts say the phrasing of the survey question makes that figure likely overstated.
Plenty of barriers exist to giving engineering a stronger presence in the curriculum, including the pressure of high-stakes tests in reading and math; teacher-evaluation systems that may, as one analyst put it, make teachers more "risk averse"; little or no focus on engineering in many states' existing standards; and, a lack of teachers prepared to teach the subject.
The recent math and science survey, conducted by Horizon Research, found that just 7 percent of middle school science teachers, and 14 percent in high school, had taken one or more engineering courses in college. Only 7 percent of secondary science teachers consider themselves "very well prepared" to teach engineering.
When engineering courses are offered at the precollege level, they usually are electives.
Also, what takes place in the name of engineering education "does not always align with generally accepted ideas about the discipline and practice of engineering," said the report from the NRC and the National Academy of Engineering.
That document outlines three principles of K-12 engineering education. It should: stress engineering design; incorporate key and developmentally appropriate math, science, and technology skills; and promote engineering "habits of mind," such as systems thinking, creativity, and collaboration.
Several universities have recently set up programs to prepare engineering teachers at the high school level. The University of Texas at Austin launched a UTeach Engineering program a few years ago (akin to its program focusing on math and science teachers). The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga and the University of California, Berkeley, have followed suit with UTeach programs that also prepare engineering teachers, said Cheryl L. Farmer, the program manager at the University of Texas. Several other universities are working on plans to develop similar programs, she said. Tufts University in 2011 launched a master's program in engineering education.
In addition to preparing teachers, the UTeach Engineering program in Texas developed the new Engineer Your World high school course.
"It's an innovative course for students who want to learn more about engineering and its role in shaping our world," said Ms. Farmer.

An excited Michael Connelly sees his team's tower get crushed during an exercise testing the durability of tower design in an honors engineering class at Stoughton High School in Stoughton, Mass. Engineering is building momentum in K-12.
—Charlie Mahoney/Prime for Education Week
One pilot site using the course is the brand new Lake Washington STEM School in Redmond, Wash., where Principal Cynthia L. Duenas said she was surprised to discover that many STEM schools she has visited did not include engineering in a meaningful way.
"We discovered that the 'e' in STEM was almost an afterthought," she said. "That really stuck in my mental file, so my team and I decided that it had to be on equal footing with technology, science, and math."
In one project, engineering teacher Arny W. Leslie said, students faced a scenario in which they were to build wind turbines for Haiti to generate electricity for running water pumps.
"What I've been impressed by is the way the math and science concepts have never seemed like an add-on," Mr. Leslie said.
Meanwhile, the College Board is actively exploring the development of a new course framework and assessment in engineering design, but with a twist. The idea is to produce a portfolio assessment, as is now used for AP Studio Art.

Common Standards

The common standards for science, due out soon, may pave the way to give engineering more attention in schools, observers say.
Currently, no states have stand-alone engineering standards, and only about a dozen have included engineering "formally" in their science standards, according to Greg Pearson, a senior program officer at the National Academy of Engineering. Two states often highlighted as having a strong engineering dimension in their science standards are Massachusetts and Minnesota.
RELATED BLOG
The common standards identify as a key stated aim that students apply their learning through scientific inquiry and the engineering-design process to deepen understanding.
Some engineering experts criticized a recent public draft, issued in January, saying it gave the subject short shrift and was a step backward from an earlier draft.
But Cary I. Sneider, a member of the science-standards writing team, said the final version will reflect significant changes that help to address such concerns.
"The engineering concepts were fragmented" in the prior draft, said Mr. Sneider, an associate research professor at Portland State University in Oregon.
"Engineering design is woven deeply into the core of the standards," he said, "so it should become really a part of every science education program, from K-12."
Even as engineering courses are becoming more widely available in schools, some experts say the most practical way to expose students to engineering on a widespread basis is by integrating it with the math or science courses they already take.
That's the approach of two projects the Stevens Institute of Technology, in Hoboken, N.J., is working on in collaboration with other universities and backed by NSF grants. They infuse engineering concepts and design activities with high school science classes, including biology, chemistry, and physics.
"Kids are always saying, 'Why do I need to learn this, and what am I going to do with it?" said Arthur
Camins, who directs the Stevens Institute's Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education.
In one unit, students tackle reducing climate change through the design and construction of a small-scale algae farm to help cut CO2emissions.
In addition, Mr. Camins' center has devised and is scaling up an underwater robotics program delivered mainly at summer camps.
"Virtually everything around us has been engineered, Mr. Camins said at the recent forum on engineering education. "And so it's kind of insane not to engage kids in thinking about that ... and the decisionmaking process that goes into all that design."
Coverage of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education is supported by a grant from the Noyce Foundation, at www.noycefdn.org.